brodsky/open cable
as broadcast Sept. 21, 1999
The heart
of the matter is a concept called the open cable network. If you get on the Internet through your
telephone line, as most of us do, you simply dial in the Internet Service
Provider of your choice -- AOL, Earthlink, whatever -- and surf the World Wide
Web to your heart's content. That is,
while you're not waiting around for the computer to catch up.
But when
you get to the Internet through the same cable that runs into the back of your
television, everything is different.
The modem service that many cable TV companies offer is blindingly
fast. But there's a hitch. You have to use the Internet Service
Provider the cable company chooses.
America
Online, which wants to be the anywhere for everybody Internet service, decided
it wanted to have a place on the cable TV modems, giving consumers the right to
choose a service, just like you do on your computer desktop when you dial up
the Internet over the phone.
So, the
world's biggest Internet Service Provider gathered a bunch of allies into
something called the OpenNet coalition.
They opened a new front for the war, that eing, to get in the face of
the competition: the cable
industry. Specifically, the coalition
is going into court around the country challenging the transfer of cable TV
licenses from cable giant TCI to TCI's new owner, AT&T. The coalition's argument: opening up cable modem access to competing
Intenret Service Providers should be a condition of the merger. The license transfers of cable operator
MediaOne, which AT&T also wants to buy, are next on the agenda.
What makes
the open Internet issue so much fun is that it turns the whole
telecommunications world onits head.
Free marketeers suddenly think monopoly's a good idea... monopolists are
suddenly fearless crusaders for the open market.
Take for
example the cable companies. Their fight, to keep the Internet competitors off
of the cables laid into our homes by the cable industry, is being championed by
AT&T. This is the same company that
has been fighting like crazy to force local telephone companies to open up
their networks to competition, because they say monopoly raises the cost of
service for consumers.
But as the
new cable giant, AT&T says it needs a closed Internet system to help recoup
millions it's invested in the marvelous cables we'll all soon be using to get
email, do our banking, download movies.
On the
other hand, AOL's fight for open access to the TV cables is joined by a pair of
monopoly-loving local phone giants -- GTE and U S West, which have been
battling like crazy to keep long disance companies, like AT&T, out of their
local markets.
It's a
tangled web. What the consumer wants is
simple -- open competition, the most providers possible vying for our business,
which will lead to better service and lower prices for cable TV, phone and the
Internet. Closed markets don't do
anyone any good.
So, who
should be my ISP? AT&T-TCI, or AOL
or GTE? And so I want ADSL or Web
TV? In the end, it will be up to the
FCC. I think I'll wait and see.
In
Washington, this is Art Brodsky for Marketplace.